arXiv preprint ·
Retracing Hodgkin and Huxley: State Recovery Does Not Certify Mechanism
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Predicting observed dynamics does not establish recovery of the underlying physical mechanism. Can machine learning retrace the hidden-state reasoning behind the Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) model? We train structured latent models on simulated current and voltage, withholding gate identities and trajectories from training and model selection. We then test response prediction, state recovery, protocol transfer, and agreement with HH dynamics. Prediction error and its cross-seed spread both drop sharply at three latent dimensions under the tested protocols, while gate recovery under new protocols improves through five to six coordinates. State recovery depends on which observations the chart uses. Observed voltage improves current-clamp decoding relative to freely predicted voltage. Under voltage clamp, adding latent state to command voltage raises m-state $R^2$ from 0.976 to above 0.99, yet the transported field disagrees with HH on identical smooth samples. Known invertible HH coordinates achieve high fast-m field agreement under the same audit procedure. An exact HH identity decomposes the discrepancy into time-scale-weighted state error and a residual in the transported field; these terms can cancel or reinforce. These findings concern the tested models and charts. They support evaluating state and dynamics recovery separately, including chart inputs and transported-field agreement across interventions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Vision--Language Signals in Constrained RL: Safety Gains Without Anticipation
Longer Records, Broader Invariance: The Hidden Scaling Problem in Longitudinal Contrastive Learning
Singularities of Non-negative Matrix Factorization and their application to Bayesian inference
FineART: Fine-Grained Annotated Robotic Trajectory Dataset and Vision-Language-Action Model for Bimanual Manipulation
Kafila: Serving Large Language Models on a Trusted Set of Heterogeneous Commodity Machines
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.