arXiv preprint ·
SAGE: Symbolic Action-Gating and Editing for LLM Task Planners
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are now the default cognitive core of embodied household agents, yet the plans they emit are rarely checked against a grounded model of the environment before execution, and the task-success they report is often measured on benchmarks so saturated that no method can be separated from another. We present SAGE (Symbolic Action-Gating and Editing), a single-LLM planner built from two lightweight mechanisms: a domain-agnostic symbolic gate (~250 lines of Python, zero tokens, $O(|π|)$) that blocks precondition-violating actions with typed reasons as a runtime safety monitor, and a local edit that regenerates only the failed sub-goal's suffix, keeping completed and untouched work intact; a hybrid seed+live memory store supports cold-start coverage. We evaluate under a leak-free protocol (leave-one-out retrieval) over five open-weight models and a 75-task AI2-THOR benchmark. On the standard benchmark goal-completeness saturates (52% of instances trivially solved) and SAGE ties strong hierarchical baselines. On a harder, method-agnostic multi-goal composition, SAGE's completeness lead re-emerges large (+0.06 to +0.23 across four models). Under injected mid-execution failures, SAGE recovers as reliably as whole-plan replanners at 2.4-3.3x fewer LLM calls. As a verify-before-execute gate, the symbolic monitor blocks unsafe actions before actuation and raises simulator-reported step-success for every planner tested (up to +0.11), a signal the verifier never sees (non-circular). Because the gate calls no model (0.008 ms/plan), it is a safety layer that runs essentially free on the edge: SAGE planning reproduces its quality on a Jetson AGX Orin, where small-model verification helps most. We release the benchmark, the leak-free protocol, the recovery and safety-gate harnesses, and a verifier-portability study (auto-induced on ALFWorld, 0.89 held-out).
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
Quantile Head for Vision-Language-Action Models
One from Infinity: Actualizing Futures from Pretrained World Models into Robot Actions
AD-E2E-JEPA: A Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture For End-to-End Autonomous Driving
FineART: Fine-Grained Annotated Robotic Trajectory Dataset and Vision-Language-Action Model for Bimanual Manipulation
Beyond Retrieval Relevance: Scene-Grounded Risk Entailment for Vision-Language Driving
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.