arXiv preprint ·
Decision Readouts for Text-Mediated Video Anomaly Detection: An Exploratory Evaluation of Jev and Qwen
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
How much does the decision readout matter when video-derived textual evidence is held fixed? We evaluate Jev typed decisions and three Qwen readouts on a sparse development sample of 40 videos and 400 target anchors from UCF-Crime and XD-Violence, each presented as a summary and ordered captions. Each dataset contributes 20 source groups and 200 anchors, including only 10 and 37 positives, respectively. The original five-backend pilot requested 4,000 predictions; Jev Choice returned 776 valid responses out of 800 under the study's strict numerical policy, blocking its full-coverage quality comparison. On XD captions, Jev Noul achieved 75.99% average precision versus 48.47% for Qwen generated probability and 57.81% for the stronger local ordinal-likelihood expectation. The latter paired difference was 18.18 percentage points (95% source-group bootstrap interval 5.53-31.50). UCF did not show a corresponding advantage: caption ROC-AUC was 52.26% for Noul and 65.95% for ordinal likelihood. Both probability readouts had higher, hence worse, UCF Brier scores than the evaluation-prevalence reference of 0.0475. We additionally audit historical LAVAD scores at exactly matched anchors and distinguish response structure from numerical consistency. A binary-likelihood control is missing. These exploratory offline results characterize ranking, probability quality and interface failures; they establish neither a causal typed-interface benefit nor general superiority, calibration or end-to-end acceleration.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
SCOPD: Sparse-Context On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient Vision-Language Models
What Makes High-Magnification Knowledge Transferable? A Study of Cross-Resolution Distillation in Whole-Slide Imaging
ARCH-B: Architectural Representation, Comprehension and Hierarchy Benchmark
FineART: Fine-Grained Annotated Robotic Trajectory Dataset and Vision-Language-Action Model for Bimanual Manipulation
Quantile Head for Vision-Language-Action Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.