arXiv preprint ·
Green AI: Cost of LLM-Based Code Completion
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Code completion is one of the most widely used applications of large language models (LLMs) in software development. Open-weight LLMs are increasingly adopted for locally deployed code completion systems, partly due to privacy concerns. Despite advances in LLM accuracy, the energy cost of inference remains underexplored, particularly under large-context workloads and across programming languages. This study investigates the trade-off between accuracy and energy consumption in LLM-based code completion and how workload characteristics, context size, and model scale influence inference energy usage. We evaluate 25 open-weight LLMs on two workloads: repository-level next-line completion with varying context sizes on RepoBench, and fill-in-the-middle (FIM) code completion across Python, Java, and Rust on McEval. We analyze the influence of input tokens, output tokens, model size, and their interactions on energy consumption using correlation analysis and cluster-robust linear regression. Our findings show that the dominant drivers of energy consumption depend strongly on task structure. In RepoBench, energy consumption is primarily influenced by input context size and its interaction with model scale, whereas in McEval, output generation and its interaction with active parameter count dominate. Output generation is more energy-intensive per token than prompt processing. Across both benchmarks, smaller and heavily quantized models frequently achieve Pareto-optimal trade-offs, often providing accuracy comparable to larger FP16 models while consuming substantially less energy. Increasing model size or context length does not necessarily lead to proportionally better completion quality, while quantization can substantially improve energy efficiency with limited accuracy degradation. These findings support more energy-aware deployment strategies for sustainable AI-assisted software development.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
KernelZero: Co-Evolving Proposer and Coder for Continuously Improved GPU Kernel Generation
Towards Certificate-Driven Software Porting: A Self-Improving Agentic Harness for Scientific Program Optimization
Compositional Safety Failures in Harness Evolution: Identification and Runtime Monitoring
Faultless: A Program Equivalence Technique for Validating and Evaluating Neural Decompilers
On Device Agentic Operation Caches -- Classifier-Centric NL-to-Action Generation
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.