arXiv preprint ·
Prospective Interpretation Risk: Principled Communication Control Between LLMs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agentic systems increasingly rely on models communicating with one another, yet existing uncertainty and multi-agent methods rarely estimate how a particular receiver will interpret a message before it is sent. This matters in heterogeneous systems, where capable receivers can reconstruct different tasks from the same message. We model this as a sender-receiver problem with a latent receiver type and define prospective interpretation risk (PIR): the probability that a receiver reconstructs a task other than intended. Rather than model an LLM's full input-output behaviour, we use black-box probes relating messages, intended tasks, and receiver-specific reconstructions, yielding scalable supervision while separating interpretation from downstream capability failure. Offline, heterogeneous frozen receivers provide supervision for receiver-conditioned risk and the effects of predefined mutable message features. At deployment, history induces a posterior over receiver types, guiding message revision and selection. We introduce value of interpretation information (VoII), querying for receiver information only when its expected communication benefit exceeds its cost. Our theory characterises when receiver information has decision value and bounds such queries. Empirically, interpretation-failure rates vary by 4-13x across receivers. Receiver information reduces PIR calibration error by 68% relative to a receiver-agnostic predictor, largely by correcting receiver-specific risk levels. PIR-guided revision reduces interpretation failure by 44% relative to the original message and 40% relative to a generic rewrite, mostly through a repair that helps every receiver. VoII outperforms information-gain and random querying at matched cost on the interpretation objective it optimises, lowering interpretation failure from 3.84% to 3.79% while querying 18.2% of episodes.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
ORBIT: A Framework for Multi-Agent Safety and Security Evaluations
ReplayLens: Auditing Agents' Use of Outcomes
ParallelPilot: Supporting Coordination and Monitoring in Parallel AI Coding
Same Winners, Different Success Rates: Evaluating How LLM Agents Recover from Failures
Modular Discovery of General Game-Playing Algorithms with Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.