arXiv preprint ·
Seeing and Solving Are Not Enough for Vision-Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) answer visual questions by combining visual information extraction with downstream problem solving. We investigate a fundamental question: Does an incorrect answer necessarily reflect a failure in visual extraction or problem solving? A model may succeed at both abilities when tested separately yet still fail on the original multimodal question, a distinction that overall answer accuracy cannot reveal. To study this, we perform a question-level empirical analysis across multiple VLMs and visual domains. We define an exactly scorable task state (i.e., the visual information sufficient to solve a question) and use it to test whether the same model can extract the required state, solve the question from the ground-truth state, and answer the original multimodal question. We find that composition failures, where extraction and solving both succeed but direct answering fails, account for 17.7% to 75.6% of direct-answering errors across multiple VLMs and datasets. To address this failure mode, we introduce a simple yet effective method, termed State Realization Tuning (SRT). SRT fine-tunes LoRA adapters attached to the language-model layers while keeping the pretrained VLM weights frozen. It trains the model to output the ground-truth task state before the final answer in a single autoregressive response. SRT improves over standard supervised fine-tuning by 1.7 to 14.1 percentage points and repairs 92.5% to 98.1% of diagnosed composition failures. A single LoRA adapter trained with SRT also improves performance across substantially different task-state structures. Our work shows that having both visual extraction and problem-solving capabilities does not guarantee correct multimodal answering. Requiring the model to first output the visual information needed to solve the question can help bridge this gap.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
NutriVision: Ingredient-Conditioned Fusion and Prediction for Single-Image Food Nutrition Estimation
SCOPD: Sparse-Context On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient Vision-Language Models
Parameter-Efficient 3D Segmentation of Liver and Liver tumors: Depthwise factorization Scales Better Than Dense Convolution with Spatial Dimensionality
ARCH-B: Architectural Representation, Comprehension and Hierarchy Benchmark
SemReward-VL: Semantic Reward-Guided Video-Language Adaptation for Developmental Behavior Assessment
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.