arXiv preprint ·
MAD-Guard: Controlled Study of Autoregressive Generation versus Direct Decision Interfaces for Closed Multimodal Forensic Tasks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When should multimodal foundation models generate tokens, and when should they directly output a decision? We present MAD-Guard, a controlled study of output-decision interfaces for closed multimodal forensic tasks. Once a multimodal representation is computed, is autoregressive generation necessary for closed forensic decisions with high input complexity but low output entropy? Under a matched Qwen3-VL-8B backbone, 2,400 FakeClue training samples, and LoRA budget ($r=16, α=32$) on Huawei Ascend 910C NPUs, we evaluate a progression of decision interfaces (AR-SFT [generate] $\to$ Logit Slice $\to$ Binary Direct Head $\to$ +choice $\to$ +act $\to$ CLM-Head) and decompose latency into backbone representation (53.12 ms), 151,643-way vocabulary projection (+85.04 ms $\to$ 138.16 ms), and decoding (+248.26 ms $\to$ 386.42 ms). Under 1-to-1 binary supervision ($\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{BCE}}$), a Binary Direct Head cuts latency by $2.60\times$-$7.27\times$ (53.12 ms) and lowers calibration error by $1.88\times$ (ECE = 0.0450 vs. 0.0845), with a -1.80% accuracy trade-off (93.10% vs. 94.90%; 0.9795 vs. 0.9871 ROC-AUC) from forfeiting token priors. Gains above AR-SFT arise either from multi-task attribution and uncertainty gating (+choice+act: 96.44% accuracy, 0.9940 ROC-AUC, 0.0187 ECE at 53.71 ms) or from a disaggregated contrastive head (CLM-Head: 96.55% binary and 96.44% multi-task accuracy, 0.0166 ECE, 98.79% 7-class attribution at 54.42 ms) retaining semantic priors without token decoding. Across 5,000 out-of-sample images from five benchmarks, our framework excels on synthetic, camouflage, and document forgeries (96.44% GenImage, 97.73% Chameleon, 91.84% Doc) while showing a clear boundary on compressed face manipulation (FF++ ROC-AUC = 0.5913).
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Zero-Storage Procedural Neural Synthesis via Boundary Dynamics: Formal Verification in Lean 4 and Bare-Metal Gauntlet Validation
Faultless: A Program Equivalence Technique for Validating and Evaluating Neural Decompilers
ORBIT: A Framework for Multi-Agent Safety and Security Evaluations
Certified Multi-Source Integrity for Structured Agent Actions
Leaky Students: Membership Inference against On-Policy Distillation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.