arXiv preprint ·
EverMine: Dissecting the Self-Evolution of Research Capabilities in Long-Horizon Alpha Research
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Self-evolving agents aim to turn research feedback into reusable skills, tools, and research rules. Whether these accumulated capabilities continue to improve later research requires controlled evaluation. Long-horizon alpha discovery provides a state-dependent setting: once a new factor enters the portfolio, the predictive information already covered changes, so the value of the same candidate or experience may change over time. We introduce EverMine, an empirical framework for studying self-evolving research capabilities in long-horizon alpha discovery. EverMine decomposes the research state into history (Hist), the current factor portfolio (Frontier), and reusable capabilities (Cap). Under matched resource limits, we compare complete runs with fixed or evolving Cap, and replace Cap while holding Hist and Frontier fixed to estimate the conditional value of accumulated capabilities. We also combine full trajectories with historical-state replay to examine how experience-based decisions affect candidate selection and portfolio outcomes. Across 18 long-horizon trajectories, end-to-end comparisons show no consistent gain from Cap evolution. Across 48 continuation branches from shared Hist and Frontier states, accumulated Cap also does not consistently outperform the initial Cap. Parameter tuning of existing factor structures can still improve the portfolio. In an exploratory replay of two screening batches from one Evolving trajectory, some screened-out candidates have positive marginal value at the original state, yet submitting all screened-out candidates sequentially slightly lowers final portfolio IC in both batches. These results show that candidate value depends on the evolving portfolio and submission order, and motivate evaluating self-evolving research capabilities through end-to-end outcomes, conditional capability value, and the consequences of experience-based decisions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
From Word Counts to Context: Topic Models for Asset Pricing
Packets, Transactions and Queues: Design Principles for HFT Systems from a Measurement Study of CME Market Data
From Cointegration to Out-of-Sample Failure: A Pairs-Trading Case Study on PEP-KO
Model-agnostic noise reduction for high-dimensional time series data
A Generalized Langevin Model of Latent Liquidity and Concave Price Impact
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.