arXiv preprint ·
LLM4Trust: Exploring the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Trust Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Trust evaluation plays a critical role in cybersecurity by supporting risk mitigation and decision-making. A variety of trust evaluation methods have been proposed, with learning-based approaches offering high accuracy and automation. However, they often require substantial ground truth, suffer from low training efficiency, lack support for basic trust properties, and provide limited explainability. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a compelling alternative due to their strong zero-/few-shot reasoning abilities and broad knowledge. To this end, we propose LLM4Trust, the first benchmark framework that systematically explores the capabilities of LLMs for trust evaluation. We first construct diverse trust graphs to model five basic trust properties and design corresponding property understanding tasks. We then assess the ability of eight representative LLMs to understand these properties under nine prompt methods. Based on this exploration, we identify the most effective LLM-prompt combinations and apply them to five real-world datasets for validating LLMs' trust evaluation capability. During this process, we propose two strategies to extract key information from large-scale trust graphs, addressing the context window limitations of LLMs. Extensive experiments show that LLMs can effectively understand basic trust properties and have great potential for real-world trust evaluation, particularly under limited supervision. However, they remain vulnerable to attacks targeting trust graphs and demonstration examples used in few-shot prompting, and incur high inference costs. Accordingly, we propose a defense mechanism and batch inference to improve the robustness and efficiency of LLM-based trust evaluation. The source code of LLM4Trust is available at https://github.com/Jieerbobo/LLM4Trust
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Byzantine-Robust Federated RAG via Aligned Calibration and Fixed-Membership Conformal Prediction
Vision--Language Signals in Constrained RL: Safety Gains Without Anticipation
Improving the Diversity of LLM Outputs without a Trade-off
Singularities of Non-negative Matrix Factorization and their application to Bayesian inference
Balancing Early Performance Sacrifices with Long-Term Gains: Scaling Learning-Rate Warmup Duration Across Training Horizons
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.