arXiv preprint ·
When Evidence Changes the Subject: Subject-Typed Claim Licensing for Learned Routing
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Modern learned systems increasingly combine learned components with search, repair, or external solvers. Benchmarks often measure the resulting end-to-end system, while scientific claims may concern only one component, creating an attribution problem: evidence can fail to support the requested component-level claim while still supporting a positive conclusion about the larger system. Existing evidence-to-claim methods primarily calibrate claim strength. We argue that composite systems require a second dimension: scientific subject. We address this problem with subject-typed claim licensing, which separates weaker conclusions about the requested subject from positive but non-substitutive credit about another subject. We instantiate this idea in SCOPE-Routing for preference-conditioned multigraph routing. Non-authors reproducibly apply the declared semantics; held-out review yields fewer reference-relative upward deviations than unstructured review, while the difference from a strong evidence checklist remains unresolved; and a controlled routing study shows that score-optimal and claim-eligible methods can differ while valid hybrid-system credit is preserved. These results motivate treating claim strength and scientific subject as distinct dimensions of evidence-based evaluation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Improving the Diversity of LLM Outputs without a Trade-off
Large Language Models for Structured Clinical Data Analysis: Dual-Agent Grounding and Validation
Agent Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Trajectories from LLM Internal States
ARCH-B: Architectural Representation, Comprehension and Hierarchy Benchmark
More than 83.69% of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are distinct
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.