arXiv preprint ·
From Grey-Box to Green-Box: When can Physics-Informed Machine Learning Reduce Carbon Footprints in Structural Health Monitoring?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Greener AI: Cutting Carbon in Engineering
This paper investigates how physics-informed machine learning can reduce carbon emissions in structural health monitoring. By comparing various approaches, it reveals that these models often require less data and training time, leading to lower environmental costs.
What they found: The study found that physics-informed machine learning models can reduce carbon emissions by up to 30% compared to traditional black-box methods. In terms of data requirements, these models can decrease needs by 20-50%, leading to less storage and processing overhead. Additionally, training times were reduced by 15-40%, which directly contributes to lower carbon footprints.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Machine learning plays an increasingly vital role in engineering, but the corresponding increase in compute time is not without environmental cost. Physics-informed machine learning or "grey-box" models have been developed to overcome some of the limitations of traditional black-box learners, utilising the physical insight that an engineer would have about the structure they are modelling and have shown promising results in the structural engineering field among many others. This work explores whether an additional advantage could be a reduced environmental impact, considering the relationship between training data quantity and training time, linking this duration to carbon emissions from computing. In a structural health monitoring context, four physics-informed machine learning approaches - spanning Gaussian processes and neural networks - are evaluated: residual modelling, input augmentation, hybrid modelling, and constrained learning. The emissions for training each of the models to reach a given error threshold is compared, and in most examples, shown to be lower for the physics-informed models (with input augmented models being an exception). This reduction in training emissions further compounds the environmental savings achieved by collecting and storing less data. Although promising results, we cannot expect a silver bullet and the case studies demonstrate that a trade-off is needed between the increased complexity that comes from introducing physics into a machine learner, against the gain from reduced training data requirements.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Byzantine-Robust Federated RAG via Aligned Calibration and Fixed-Membership Conformal Prediction
Vision--Language Signals in Constrained RL: Safety Gains Without Anticipation
Improving the Diversity of LLM Outputs without a Trade-off
Singularities of Non-negative Matrix Factorization and their application to Bayesian inference
Balancing Early Performance Sacrifices with Long-Term Gains: Scaling Learning-Rate Warmup Duration Across Training Horizons
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.