arXiv preprint ·
PhysAlign: A Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Role Alignment in Multimodal Physics Reasoning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A key challenge in physics diagram understanding is correctly associating visual information with the physical entities, relations, and conditions it describes. Even when a value, symbol, or other local element is accurately recognized, assigning it to the wrong entity or scope can distort the underlying physical premise and lead to incorrect reasoning. To systematically study this challenge, we introduce \textbf{PhysAlign}, a benchmark designed to assess whether multimodal models correctly associate information recognized from physics diagrams with its intended physical role. By disentangling visual recognition from physical-role assignment through localized probes and controlled variants, PhysAlign isolates correspondence errors from recognition failures. It contains 3,341 human-validated probes spanning 986 physics problems, enabling systematic evaluation of visual recognition and physical-role correspondence at scale. We further introduce five complementary evaluation metrics, including CAcc, GAcc, and JAcc, which provide a comprehensive assessment of models' ability to recognize diagram content, establish correct physical correspondences, and solve the underlying physics problem. Across our evaluated multimodal models, PhysAlign reveals a consistent gap between local visual recognition and physical-role grounding. Even when the queried content is correctly recognized, the conditional correspondence error rate remains 13.8\% for GPT-6-Astra and rises to about 50.6\% for InternVL3.5-8B. These findings indicate that strong perception alone does not ensure reliable physical interpretation, exposing a distinct grounding bottleneck that is largely hidden by answer-level accuracy and highlighting the need for future models to better align recognized visual evidence with its physical meaning.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Improving the Diversity of LLM Outputs without a Trade-off
Large Language Models for Structured Clinical Data Analysis: Dual-Agent Grounding and Validation
Agent Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Trajectories from LLM Internal States
ARCH-B: Architectural Representation, Comprehension and Hierarchy Benchmark
More than 83.69% of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are distinct
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.