arXiv preprint ·
Two Heads Are Better Than One: Aggregating Weaker LLMs for Better Forecasts
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to forecast real-world events, but access to the strongest individual forecaster may be costly or otherwise constrained. We study weak-to-strong forecast aggregation: can individually weaker LLM forecasters be aggregated to outperform a stronger forecaster? Using ForecastBench (Karger et al., 2025), we evaluate 70 LLM forecasters across 16 comparison groups, each with more than 1,000 shared subquestions, yielding 1,121 weaker-model pairs. Within each group, we identify the strongest individual by test Brier score and evaluate aggregates composed exclusively of weaker forecasters, with aggregation weights learned on separate training data. We find substantial evidence of weak-to-strong improvement. Learned linear pooling identifies a weaker pair that matches or outperforms the strongest individual in 11 of 16 groups and comes within 5% of its Brier score in all 16 groups. We also find that these improvements do not rely on having a near-best constituent and are generally accompanied by good calibration. Additional analyses show that adding more models does not consistently improve performance, and competitive weaker-model aggregates also remain available under practical constraints.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Byzantine-Robust Federated RAG via Aligned Calibration and Fixed-Membership Conformal Prediction
Vision--Language Signals in Constrained RL: Safety Gains Without Anticipation
Improving the Diversity of LLM Outputs without a Trade-off
Singularities of Non-negative Matrix Factorization and their application to Bayesian inference
Balancing Early Performance Sacrifices with Long-Term Gains: Scaling Learning-Rate Warmup Duration Across Training Horizons
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.