arXiv preprint ·
Beyond Accuracy: Counterfactual Fragility and Demographic Bias in Clinical Evaluation of LLMs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Clinical LLM evaluation often emphasizes answer accuracy; however, accuracy alone does not test counterfactual consistency or demographic robustness. We evaluated six LLMs on 150 MedQA USMLE questions using two automated perturbation tests to assess their performance. The counterfactual validity (CFV) test asked each model to make a minimal, plausible clinical change that would make a different answer correct. The demographic robustness test added six demographic prefixes to the same vignette and compared the answers and explanations with a no demographic baseline. Of the 900 CFV attempts, 228 (25.3 %) were valid and 672 were invalid. Across 5,400 demographic comparisons, 1,097 answers were changed (20.3%). Automated judging identified 3,128 stereotype evidence flags, including 1,932 in the broad Other category. MedGemma 27B achieved the highest accuracy (87.1%) and CFV (63.3%), lowest answer change rate (16.0%), and low mean Explanation Demographic Dissonance (EDD) score (0.169). However, its accuracy still exceeded its CFV, indicating that correct answers do not guarantee reliable performance on the counterfactual validity task. OpenBioLLM had the highest answer change rate and EDD, whereas GLM had the highest stereotype flag rate. These findings show that accuracy, CFV, answer stability, EDD, and stereotype evidence capture different evaluation aspects. Because all judgments were automated and no clinician validation was available, the results support safety screening but do not establish clinical deployability of the model.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Emergent One-Third Scaling Law as Attention Tries to Concentrate
Improving the Diversity of LLM Outputs without a Trade-off
Residual Streams Read, Recurrent States Remember: The Global Workspace in Mamba Models
Agent Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Trajectories from LLM Internal States
Empowering Hybrid Attention Models on NPUs
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.