arXiv preprint ·

Using Machine Learning to Investigate Predictors of Fasting Blood Glucose: Insights into Circadian Timing and Age Interactions

Viktoriya Bu-Dager and Silvia Cirstea

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Published in
Research Square
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-9418810/v1
Original
Read it at arXiv
Cited by
0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
Topics
Machine Learning

In brief

Unlocking Blood Sugar Insights with AI

This study introduces a robust machine learning framework that integrates metabolic, hormonal, and lifestyle variables to predict fasting blood glucose. By focusing on circadian interactions, it sheds light on how timing and age affect glucose regulation.

What they found: The study's final model, an interaction-augmented XGBoost, demonstrated impressive predictive performance with a mean absolute error of 0.0804 and a coefficient of determination of 0.7761. Key predictors included glycohemoglobin and insulin, with circadian interactions, particularly sleep midpoint and age, also playing a role. These results highlight the importance of considering biological timing in metabolic health assessments.

AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.

Abstract

Impaired glucose regulation is a major contributor to metabolic dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. This study developed an interpretable machine-learning framework to predict log-transformed fasting blood glucose using metabolic, hormonal, lifestyle, demographic, nutritional, and circadian variables from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017--2020 pre-pandemic dataset. After merging multiple NHANES sub-datasets, data processing used a leakage-resistant pipeline in which imputation, scaling, and one-hot encoding were performed only after dataset splitting and within training folds. Elastic Net, LASSO, and XGBoost models were evaluated using 94 candidate predictors and engineered circadian interaction terms. Performance was assessed using mean absolute error, root mean squared error, coefficient of determination, calibration, and Shapley Additive Explanations. The final interaction-augmented XGBoost model achieved strong performance on the independent test set, with a mean absolute error of 0.0804, a root mean squared error of 0.1148, and a coefficient of determination of 0.7761, using 10 predictors. Glycohemoglobin was the dominant predictor, followed by insulin, diabetes diagnosis, gamma-glutamyl transferase, age, race, and gender. Among the engineered interaction terms, sleep midpoint multiplied by age was consistently retained in repeated random-split analyses, although its contribution remained modest relative to dominant glycaemic predictors. These findings support further investigation of circadian-age interactions in metabolic health.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics