arXiv preprint ·
Certifying Interventional Agreement Among Observationally Equivalent Causal Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Observationally equivalent causal models can still disagree about what happens under intervention, because interventions create inputs that never occur in observational data. We introduce Interventional Separation Selection (ISS), which repeatedly queries the true system with an admissible intervention on which the surviving candidate models disagree, discards the candidates the outcome contradicts, and stops once no intervention within a cost bound separates the survivors. If the true system is among the candidates, this stopping condition certifies that every survivor agrees with it on every admissible intervention within the bound, a guarantee that no observational learner can give, however much data it sees. The stopping condition depends only on the survivors, so it can be checked without knowing the truth. For continuous variables the candidates form an infinite version space, and mixed-integer linear programs decide the stopping condition exactly over all of it, with agreement holding up to a tolerance. On a three-digit colored MNIST causal abstraction task in which ink hue tracks digit size, plain convolutional networks trained on examples reach zero held-out error, yet disagree with shape-based labels on 26% of single-digit edits, as often as hue-based labels do. Auditing the causal abstractions of networks observed only on such images, ISS certifies what each network perceives with 13.6 interventions per image on average, and each certificate, checked against every admissible intervention, holds whenever the network's true abstraction is among the candidates. When a network bypasses a unit that every candidate abstraction relies on, certificates covering interventions on that unit can be silently void, and twenty random validation interventions refute 69% of them.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Emergent One-Third Scaling Law as Attention Tries to Concentrate
Improving the Diversity of LLM Outputs without a Trade-off
Residual Streams Read, Recurrent States Remember: The Global Workspace in Mamba Models
Agent Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Trajectories from LLM Internal States
Empowering Hybrid Attention Models on NPUs
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.