arXiv preprint ·
CausalDriveBench: Evaluating Causal Reasoning in Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving produce natural-language reasoning alongside predicted trajectories, but whether this reasoning reflects the causal structure of the scene remains untested. We introduce CausalDriveBench, an evaluation framework grounded in Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (PCH) that tests causal reasoning in driving-specific VLAs through structured visual question answering (QA) and alternative-trajectory prediction. To this end, we construct causal scene graphs over nuScenes that distinguish causally active, dormant, and distractor entities, separating perceptual salience from causal relevance. The benchmark spans all four rungs of PCH (association, intervention, and counterfactual along with causal discovery) for QA generation. For the higher rungs, we additionally provide reference trajectories under specified scene modifications, enabling action-level verification that complements reasoning-level evaluation. In total, the benchmark contains 7,285 verified causal QA pairs and 1,000 counterfactual trajectories derived from nuScenes. We evaluate 10 driving-specific VLAs and 3 general-purpose VLMs, and report three findings. First, the best model reaches only 70.6% QA accuracy, and 4 of 13 models score below random chance. Second, comparing each driving VLA to the general-purpose VLM that shares its language backbone, the cost of driving fine-tuning ranges from 2 to 34 percentage points on causal QA, with post-training design explaining the spread. Third, causal QA and trajectory accuracy are statistically uncorrelated across models: under counterfactual prompts, predicted trajectories either over-react or collapse onto the observed-scene baseline. Taken together, these results show that neither fluent rationales nor accurate observed-scene trajectories constitute evidence of causal understanding.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Active 3D weaves for load-bearing and damage-resilient locomotion
Is Online Interaction Necessary for Recovery? A Minimalist Approach to Robust Planning via Perturbation
SAMBAR: Selective Anchoring via Method of Multipliers for Balanced Knowledge Acquisition and Retention in Vision-Language-Action Models
SwingRL: Adaptive Observation Reinforcement Learning with World-Model Prediction for Cable-Suspended Hoisting Control
Residual Denoising Enables Sample-Efficient Multi-Agent Coordination on Demand
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.