arXiv preprint ·
Reasoning Concentrates Errors, and Self-Consistency Never Notices
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Self-consistency assumes that independent samples disagree when a model is unsure, so agreement is evidence of correctness. Holding weights fixed and toggling only a reasoning mode, over five benchmarks and 74,944 samples, we show that reasoning concentrates a model's errors: the probability that two independently drawn wrong answers coincide rises in all ten dataset-scale comparisons (p = 0.00098), and in nine of nine after restricting both arms to the problems each gets wrong. Where the answer space is unbounded, reasoning cuts the distinct answers produced to 0.43-0.65 of the non-reasoning count; where it is bounded, both arms hold an identical option set and reasoning concentrates mass on it instead, which no positional prior can explain at fixed weights. The aggregate cost is smaller than the mechanism predicts, because reasoning also shrinks the set of problems where answer diversity can decide anything, in ten of ten cells and by 2.7x; normalized for available headroom, both arms convert a quarter of it in domain. Confidence weighting does not recover what is left. Across 280 method-dataset-model combinations on eight models and five benchmarks, not one beats plain majority voting after correction; weighted voting agrees with it on 98.5% of problem-method pairs and is right 56.3% of the time on the rest; and a signal's direction can invert within fixed weights, with answer log-probability predicting correctness when reasoning is off and error when it is on. A learned six-signal combination gains nothing out of domain. Confidence signals should be evaluated on decisions, not on discrimination.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
A Framework for Identifying, Categorizing, and Explaining Bias in AI-Generated Code
Emergent One-Third Scaling Law as Attention Tries to Concentrate
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Residual Streams Read, Recurrent States Remember: The Global Workspace in Mamba Models
LLM Parkinsonism: Executive-Control Failure, Token-Inefficient Persistence, and an Uncertainty-Aware Global Executive Control Architecture for Autonomous Language-Model Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.