arXiv preprint ·
ConflictVLA-Bench: Benchmarking Behavioral Responses of Vision-Language-Action Models to Premise Conflicts
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models perform strongly on manipulation tasks, their responses to invalid task premises remain underexplored. Existing evaluations of premise conflicts often focus on terminal task outcomes, yet task failure alone cannot distinguish behavioral disengagement from continued pursuit followed by an execution error. We call the latter pattern Failed Persistence. To study this phenomenon, we introduce ConflictVLA-Bench, which pairs conflict rollouts with premise-consistent reference rollouts and evaluates both outcomes and execution processes. Built on LIBERO, the benchmark contains 2,826 prompt-conditioned conflict tasks spanning four conflict families, four structural configurations, and two prompt conditions. Across all eight VLAs, invalid premises reduce original goal completion by at least 17.3 percentage points, with the reduction reaching 56.2 percentage points for OpenVLA. Crucially, even when models succeed on premise-consistent tasks and fail on their matched conflict tasks, they often continue to approach the original targets, retain early trajectory structure, and show limited action magnitude suppression. Failed Persistence therefore recurs across the evaluated models. Explicit premise checking does not consistently produce selective and coordinated behavioral changes. These findings show that terminal failure alone establishes neither behavioral disengagement nor refusal and that outcomes alone are insufficient for VLA evaluation. Experimental data and additional details are available on the project page: https://github.com/EmbodiedAISurvey/ConflictVLA-Bench
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
MR. POP: Multi-Robot Parallel Optimizing Planner for Almost-Surely Asymptotically Optimal Planning
Active 3D weaves for load-bearing and damage-resilient locomotion
Can a Robot Read Braille? - Learning to Adapt Contact via Imitation Learning for Tactile Braille Recognition
SAMBAR: Selective Anchoring via Method of Multipliers for Balanced Knowledge Acquisition and Retention in Vision-Language-Action Models
Multi-Objective Human-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization of a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.