arXiv preprint ·
Do we need to answer that question? Salience and Answerability of Potential Questions in Naturalistic Dialogue
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We empirically investigate Question Under Discussion based modelling in naturalistic dialogue by studying whether the salience of generated potential questions predicts their subsequent resolution. Building on Wu et al. (2024), we construct a dataset of 7,124 questions automatically generated from utterances and preceding context from the British National Corpus, and annotated for salience and answerability. We find a robust but low positive correlation between salience and answerability in dialogue, indicating that more salient questions are more likely to be addressed. However, this effect is markedly weaker than in monologic text, suggesting that conversational structure is less predictable. We further observe that structured interactions exhibit stronger alignment between annotators than less organised dialogues.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Recursive Self-Improvement via On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning
Using LMs to Model the Effects of Context and Coreference during Sentence Comprehension
Prompt Injection Detection for Email Agents Through Attack Chain Modeling
Checking Leakage Witnesses versus Certifying Bounded Non-Leakage
TRACE: Temporal Audit and Condition-aware Evaluation of Streaming Video Understanding
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.