arXiv preprint ·
XPhysICS: Cross-Physical-Domain Threat Grounding for Industrial Control Systems Security
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Industrial control system attacks are usually documented in terms of the plant where they occurred: its sensors, actuators, process stages, and control logic. Yet many attacks express a more general physical pattern--such as suppressing flow, corrupting chemical dosing, or driving a vessel toward overflow--that may also matter in a different plant. The challenge is deciding when such a threat remains meaningful on a new system rather than relying on similar component names or broad semantic labels. We present XPhysICS, a methodology for grounding documented cyber-physical threats onto a specific target system. XPhysICS converts source evidence into a provenance-linked description of what is manipulated, what physical consequence is expected, and what observations the evidence calls for. Once this analyst-guided abstraction, its vocabulary and schema version, and a target contract are fixed, XPhysICS applies deterministic grounding checks. An accepted result can be represented as a validation slice that records the mapped roles, signals, dependencies, and context intended to support later evaluation. We study 83 threat abstractions across continuous-process and manufacturing sources using separate evaluation denominators. The continuous-process study evaluates 78 abstractions against target contracts spanning water treatment, water distribution, hydropower, and chemical processes. Selected cases are exercised through controlled perturbations of simulator-role signals. We also test compatibility with several analysis styles, including the released upstream GeCo implementation, and conduct a three-objective, one-target realizability study using a paper-derived search reproduction. Across these evaluated settings, the results support treating explicit target checks and traceable evidence as separate from semantic similarity alone.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Prompt Injection Detection for Email Agents Through Attack Chain Modeling
Checking Leakage Witnesses versus Certifying Bounded Non-Leakage
Werracle: Sub-Cent Intra-Block AI Reflex Oracles and Flash-Loan Circuit Breakers for EVM Smart Contracts
DegreeSpar: Structured Degree Sparsity for Efficient Secure Transformer Inference
Input-Layer Starvation: Why Per-Layer Pruning Breaks IoT Intrusion Detectors
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.