arXiv preprint ·
Audit Before You Commit: Locating Belief Failures in Active Identification for One-Shot Manipulation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A robot that probes a few times before one irreversible action, such as tapping a surface before inserting a peg, must decide when the evidence is enough to commit. We argue that this decision rests on two conditions that existing methods do not separate: the belief must still cover the truth in the coordinate that decides the action, and the failure model that scores actions must track realized failure. We audit both conditions separately, offline and with ground truth, on a deployed probe-then-commit pipeline: a particle belief, a scenario failure score, and one commit. On simulated insertion, more taps sharpen the belief while the truth leaves its support on 16.9% of episodes and the failure score turns optimistic by 0.31. Conformal calibration restores coverage but not the decision: confidently wrong instances still pass a confidence gate. The audit's signatures instead point at the observation model, where a hand scan finds a 2.1 mm error in the tap boundary. Correcting that one number cuts failure from 0.354 to 0.112 on untouched instances and transfers unrefitted to a second engine, while in a third engine the same audit suggests an execution-model mismatch instead. Across seven task families in three engines, a few probes at a fixed executor reduce miss or failure. On a physical arm inserting a tool into a rigid pocket by touch, the gain and the audit's two conditions reproduce, and replaying the recorded taps under an injected model error shows the audit's signature on real data. Additional materials are available at https://sites.google.com/view/auditbeforeyoucommit.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
Direction-Scale Decomposition in Action Representation: Rethinking What to Tokenize for Vision-Language-Action Models
MR. POP: Multi-Robot Parallel Optimizing Planner for Almost-Surely Asymptotically Optimal Planning
Online Sim-to-Real Adaptation via Closed-Loop System Modeling
Can a Robot Read Braille? - Learning to Adapt Contact via Imitation Learning for Tactile Braille Recognition
Fly, Drive, Reconfigure: A Modular Reconfigurable Aerial-Ground Platform for Field Operations
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.