arXiv preprint ·
Auditing Latent-Space Monitors for Autonomous Driving
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Runtime failure monitors can use a model's internal representations to anticipate failures. We audit this monitoring strategy across two autonomous-driving tasks: online vectorized map generation with LaneSegNet and end-to-end planning with VAD. We find that frame-level errors are predictable at inference in both tasks. For LaneSegNet, a supervised latent probe reaches Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.780 for high Chamfer error; to our knowledge, this is the first post-hoc frame-level failure monitor for online vectorized map generation. For VAD, a supervised planning-latent probe reaches AUROC 0.868 for mean-ADE failure. Our audit shows that internal access is not necessary for strong failure prediction. A monitor using only LaneSegNet's prediction outputs reaches AUROC 0.825, while for VAD, ego state, driving command, and the planner's predicted trajectory reach 0.924 on the same mean-ADE endpoint. Adding latent features to either baseline yields no statistically resolved improvement. This observation persists across a broad suite of planning failure endpoints, including endpoints whose labels depend on geometry unavailable to the non-latent baseline. Thus, predicting failure from an internal representation does not establish that the representation provides useful information beyond observable inputs and outputs. We propose an evaluation protocol for testing the incremental value of latent access and release our per-frame failure endpoint labels.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
Direction-Scale Decomposition in Action Representation: Rethinking What to Tokenize for Vision-Language-Action Models
MR. POP: Multi-Robot Parallel Optimizing Planner for Almost-Surely Asymptotically Optimal Planning
Online Sim-to-Real Adaptation via Closed-Loop System Modeling
Can a Robot Read Braille? - Learning to Adapt Contact via Imitation Learning for Tactile Braille Recognition
Fly, Drive, Reconfigure: A Modular Reconfigurable Aerial-Ground Platform for Field Operations
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.