arXiv preprint ·
PolicyAttention: Softmax Attention Implements Policy Mirror Descent for Closed-Loop Control
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Can causal softmax attention implement policy mirror descent as a repeated controller rather than a one-step algebraic identity? Negative-entropy policy mirror descent (PMD) has the statewise update $\operatorname{PMD}_η(π,Q)=\operatorname{softmax}(\logπ+ηQ)$. Building on the known Q-TD-PMD recursion, we construct one fixed causal-softmax actor--environment--one-step-critic protocol with explicit actor, routing, sampling, and normalization residuals, and propagate them to the policy actually returned. The construction states the finite-logit/full-support domain, the external tokenization and sampling boundary, and the mean-zero LayerNorm carrier conditions required by the normalized compilation. Separately trained pre-LN Transformers recover the target computation empirically. A frozen one-step audit model is closest to PMD among the tested fixed rules; in a preregistered five-run $S=4$ repeated-control test, the learned actor with an exact one-step critic reaches median returned-policy loss $1.052\times$ the Exact PMD oracle and retains the criterion across four no-retraining shifts. The same checkpoints with their learned critic give descriptive median $1.050\times$ the oracle (no registered margin). At $S=8$, replacing the exact critic by the learned critic raises median $T=20$ loss to $0.0225$ yet leaves the Liang--Lai and Algorithm Distillation adaptations $20.2$--$24.2\times$ higher-loss; this is a one-sided sampled-critic bound because PolicyAttention consumes 144 generative transitions per round versus 20 on-policy transitions for the adaptations. The strict 20-transition comparison remains open. At $S=8,16$, the exact-critic common-harness comparison remains $17.7$--$28.2\times$ lower-loss than those adaptations, with the information asymmetry stated locally.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Human-AI-Powered Hypothesis Testing: Cost-Aware Selective AI Scoring and Sequential Human Escalation
A Framework for Identifying, Categorizing, and Explaining Bias in AI-Generated Code
Forecast-Dojo: Replayable Environments for Benchmarking and Training LLM Forecasting Agents
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Broadening Uncertainty Estimation for Audio Question Answering Across Methods, Formats, and Inputs
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.