arXiv preprint ·
BioEVAL: A global, multi-institutional benchmark of large language and multimodal models for bioengineering
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated historic breakthroughs in general reasoning with early successes in biomedical science. However, existing LLM benchmarking emphasizes factual recall, offering limited insight into model performance on frontier and multimodal tasks. We assembled BioEVAL (BioEngineering Validation of AI and LLMs), a global, multi-institutional initiative designed to assess experimental reasoning capability across bioengineering (BE) subfields. BioEVAL spans 11 major BE subfields plus a set of uncategorized items, bringing together 22 research groups to create a PhD-level benchmark comprising 608 evaluation items: 1) 380 multiple-choice questions (MCQs, 359 retained after audit), 2) 218 literature synthesis tasks, and 3) 10 multimodal problems with experimental image interpretation. Benchmark items underwent authoring-group expert review and centralized quality control before evaluation. Following evaluation, a blinded cross-group consensus audit of the highest- and lowest-accuracy MCQ items flagged 21 questions for revision or removal; these were withheld, and all reported MCQ results are computed on the 359 retained items. We evaluated diverse cloud-scale foundation/multimodal models (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok) and locally deployable models suitable for inference on consumer-grade GPUs. Models achieved the highest accuracy of up to 90% on MCQs, similarity score of 0.72 on literature synthesis, and accuracy of 80% on a small sample of multimodal reasoning questions, with substantial performance variation across subfields. Leaderboard rankings characterize current capabilities, limitations, and development priorities across the evaluated BE task categories. BioEVAL is maintained as an extensible benchmark with standardized protocols for continuing expert item contribution and model evaluation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Human-AI-Powered Hypothesis Testing: Cost-Aware Selective AI Scoring and Sequential Human Escalation
A Framework for Identifying, Categorizing, and Explaining Bias in AI-Generated Code
Forecast-Dojo: Replayable Environments for Benchmarking and Training LLM Forecasting Agents
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Broadening Uncertainty Estimation for Audio Question Answering Across Methods, Formats, and Inputs
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.