arXiv preprint ·
Return or Revise? Learning When Revision Helps Retrieval-Augmented QA
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We consider the decision of whether to return an existing draft answer or revise it using retrieved evidence, as in answer-revision systems. Draft confidence estimates whether the current answer is correct, but the decision requires estimating the effect of a specified revision. For offline training and evaluation, we grade both the returned draft and its candidate revision under the same correctness judge, which makes repair, harm, and the gap to an oracle observable. We call this paired effect its recoverability, and we train policies to predict it before revision. On 25,870 held-out open-domain questions across three revision setups, a scorer trained on the paired outcome has greater area under the accuracy--revision-rate curve than a matched draft-correctness scorer in all nine Llama setup--seed fits, and gains 0.23--0.68 accuracy points on average at development-selected thresholds, a difference significant across training runs only for dense retrieval. The resulting policy improves on always revising and on average closes more than a third of the oracle gap, although it still applies 38--46% of the harmful revisions. When a draft-free standard-RAG answer is also available, however, choosing between the draft and that answer is stronger by about two points for Llama and four for OLMo, and adding candidate revision as a third option yields no significant gain. Recoverability describes one revision; its value as an available action also depends on the alternatives.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Cross-Country Code-Mixing for Generative Recommendation
Component Benchmark: Hierarchical Model Profiling for Large-scale Recommendation Systems
Seek: Self-Evaluative Exploration for Knowledge Retrieval
Recommendation World Models for Future-State Control
Claim-Gated Source-Risk Auditing for Generative Search
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.