arXiv preprint ·
Advancing Model Research in AgentX: Long-Horizon Autonomy for Industrial Recommender Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.30001
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Sustaining industrial recommendation research requires using the results of one experiment to decide what to investigate next. We present AgentX-Model, the next generation of AgentX's model research framework, which connects proposal development and model experimentation within sandboxes defined by business inputs and prediction tasks. AgentX-Model adopts a dual-agent architecture comprising a Research Agent and a Model Agent. The Research Agent develops independently reviewed proposals from papers and experimental findings, while the Model Agent conducts multi-round investigations and returns code, measurements, and unresolved questions. Using the returned results, the Research Agent selects a starting implementation and formulates the next research question, allowing subsequent experiments to build on earlier findings. We organize this continuing research around four actions: Reproduce, Follow-up, Composition, and Diagnose. The first three actions drive routine research, while Diagnose acquires the evidence needed to choose a repair, including for issues raised by business feedback and online evaluation, such as prediction bias measured by PCOC. Across the production evaluation, 560 of 636 completed model-changing experiments recorded AUC above their business baselines. As research continued, some experiments recorded AUC above every comparable ancestor in their lineages. The five latest online A/B evaluations across different business settings reported gains including 10-15% in acquisition efficiency, 15-20% in target-segment advertising spend, and 0.3-0.8% in watch time; the watch-time model used approximately 10% fewer FLOPs and parameters. A dependency-aware historical-replay benchmark further evaluates research allocation, with initial results showing no consistent efficiency gain from more complex scheduling when agents already analyze and select concrete candidates.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Cross-Country Code-Mixing for Generative Recommendation
Component Benchmark: Hierarchical Model Profiling for Large-scale Recommendation Systems
Seek: Self-Evaluative Exploration for Knowledge Retrieval
Recommendation World Models for Future-State Control
Claim-Gated Source-Risk Auditing for Generative Search
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.