arXiv preprint ·
Template Ageing and Longitudinal Verification in Fixed-Text Keystroke Dynamics: A Subject-Disjoint Study Across Eight Weeks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Behavioural biometric templates are widely believed to degrade as the gap between enrolment and verification grows, but few studies measure this template ageing effect directly under controlled conditions. We collected a longitudinal dataset of 40 fixed passwords, each typed four times per weekly session over eight consecutive weeks. We compare a scaled-Manhattan matcher (M1), a gradient-boosted classifier (M2), a TypeNet-style recurrent embedding model (M3), and a TypeFormer-style Transformer (M4) under a 5-fold subject-disjoint protocol and a design that jointly varies mechanism and the enrolment-to-query gap, from 0 to 7 weeks. Template ageing proves large and systematic. Error increases monotonically with the gap for every mechanism, from an EER of 14.6-27.2% at a gap of zero to 25.5-37.1% at seven weeks, or 1.7% of decision error per week elapsed (p < 0.001). However, the choice of mechanism matters more than its rate of ageing. Baseline accuracy spans 12.6 percentage points across the four mechanisms, the degradation each accumulates over seven weeks spans only 2.3 points, and ageing never reorders them. A matcher can therefore be chosen on same-session accuracy, with ageing managed by re-enrolment scheduling rather than by matcher selection. The two properties are nonetheless distinct, as M3 is the least accurate mechanism yet ages significantly more slowly than M1 under every specification tested. Training randomness also matters differently by architecture, with 58% of the recurrent model's fold-to-fold variance attributable to seed noise against 19% for the Transformer. Because the smaller ageing-rate differences are sensitive to modelling choices, while the accuracy differences and the ageing effect are not, we recommend that comparative ageing-rate claims be supported by seed-level score fusion, independent replication, and an alternative outcome-model specification.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Codetta: High-Capacity, Keyless, and Undetectable Multi-Agent Collusion
Prompt Injection Detection for Email Agents Through Attack Chain Modeling
On the Effectiveness of Kernel-Level Evidence for Agent Security
Werracle: Sub-Cent Intra-Block AI Reflex Oracles and Flash-Loan Circuit Breakers for EVM Smart Contracts
Fast Frame Rate Estimation in Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks on Public Systems
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.