arXiv preprint ·
Fair Feed Ranking for Participatory Budgeting
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3794786.3830735
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In large-scale participatory budgeting, citizens cannot inspect the full proposal pool, so the order in which proposals are shown becomes a form of agenda-setting power. We argue that fair exposure should therefore be treated as a democratic-design goal. We study Consul Democracy, a widely deployed open-source digital-democracy platform, and show that its proposal feeds are typically ordered by popularity, recency, or comment activity. Building on this diagnosis, we propose FairFeed, a feed-ranking design for PB that uses transparently declared preferences, boosts under-exposed proposals, and admits a rate-limited reject channel for crowd-sourced vetting. We evaluate the design in a simulation anchored in Munich's 2025 PB process and compare it with random, newest, and most-commented feeds. In this simulation, FairFeed broadens proposal discovery, distributes visibility more evenly across the eligible pool, increases cross-cutting support, and improves resistance to manipulation relative to comment-based ranking. We conclude by outlining the human-subjects evaluation needed to test whether onboarding can recover voter preferences accurately enough for deployment in practice.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Fast Frame Rate Estimation in Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks on Public Systems
Beyond the Last Truffula Tree: SustainAI - A Water-Aware, Closed-Loop Framework for Environmentally Accountable AI
Digital Medicines Information at National Scale: Search Behaviour and System Performance of MediVerify Across 1.5 Million Queries
Large language models underestimate and partly misrepresent cultural variation in everyday norms
AI-Moderated Interviews for Market Research and Digital Twins Calibration
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.