arXiv preprint ·
Hallucination Neurons and Where to Find Them: An Investigation into the existence of Hallucination Neurons
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Interpretable machine learning for Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly relies on sparse probing methods that identify small sets of neurons claimed to detect and causally influence behaviors such as factuality recall, safety alignment, and hallucination. These claims have important implications for model auditing and behavioral steering, yet they are rarely tested against known failure modes of $L_1$-regularized probing in correlated, high-dimensional feature spaces. We propose a five-step diagnostic protocol covering feature correlation, bootstrap stability, sparse versus dense ranking disagreement, intervention baselines, and cross-dataset evaluation as a minimum standard for sparse-neuron localization claims. We investigate prior work using our proposed approach, specifically on H-neurons using open-source LLMs across TriviaQA, BioASQ, and NQ-Open datasets. Our results demonstrate detection replicates across both models and datasets, and exceeds the original reported AUROC gaps for TriviaQA and BioASQ datasets. Gemma 3 4B consistently outperforms MedGemma 4B on matched datasets, with AUROC gaps of +0.311 versus +0.235 on TriviaQA, +0.474 versus +0.455 on BioASQ, and +0.128 versus +0.112 on NQ-Open respectively. Causal validation at $n = 500$ with five random seeds shows statistically significant effects beyond random same-layer baselines. At the same time, the diagnostic results indicate that the selected neurons are not uniquely localized. Across the three Gemma 3 4B settings, 19 of 22 selected H-Neurons have Pearson $|r| > 0.7$ with other features, bootstrap selections show only moderate stability, and sparse and dense rankings overlap only weakly. Our findings show that sparse predictive structure can coexist with non-unique neuron selection. Routine diagnostic validation is necessary to distinguish detection claims from localization claims in mechanistic interpretability.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Human-AI-Powered Hypothesis Testing: Cost-Aware Selective AI Scoring and Sequential Human Escalation
A Framework for Identifying, Categorizing, and Explaining Bias in AI-Generated Code
Forecast-Dojo: Replayable Environments for Benchmarking and Training LLM Forecasting Agents
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Broadening Uncertainty Estimation for Audio Question Answering Across Methods, Formats, and Inputs
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.