arXiv preprint ·
A Systematic Multi-Domain Evaluation of Document Retrievers
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Document retrieval is a crucial component of many modern AI systems, directly influencing their effectiveness, robustness, and fairness in downstream tasks. While recent years have seen a growing number of retrievers, comparative studies in the literature are typically limited in scope or focused on singular benchmarks, domains, or model families. This fragmentation makes it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about the relative strengths, weaknesses, and trade-offs of document retrievers. To address this gap, we conduct a large-scale empirical evaluation of document retrievers, covering three families (sparse, dense, and expansion-based) and evaluating 33 retrievers across seven IR datasets, analyzing retrieval quality, runtime, and failure points. Rather than tuning each model individually, we evaluate every retriever off the shelf, under the configuration reconstructable from its public documentation and a uniform compute budget. Our results show that NV-Embed-v2 achieves the strongest performance on four of the seven datasets, albeit at the cost of substantial query latencies. Among sparse retrievers, we find that SPLADE-v3 rivals the top-performing approach despite much lower latency, and even achieves top scores on MS MARCO. On instruction-following datasets, GritLM delivers the best performance. Finally, an analysis of the retrievers' failure points reveals contrasts between models and families that indicate potential for unrealized gains in retrieval performance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Cross-Country Code-Mixing for Generative Recommendation
Component Benchmark: Hierarchical Model Profiling for Large-scale Recommendation Systems
Seek: Self-Evaluative Exploration for Knowledge Retrieval
Recommendation World Models for Future-State Control
Claim-Gated Source-Risk Auditing for Generative Search
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.