arXiv preprint ·
Temperament Engineering: Designing Strategic Behavioural Diversity in Robot Swarms
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
No two robots are truly identical: calibration, battery state, sensor drift and wear give every swarm a distribution of behaviour rather than a single point, usually treated as an imperfection to be minimised. In animal collectives the reverse holds: consistent individual differences in behaviour ('temperament') are shaped by natural selection and often decisive for group performance. This perspective proposes 'temperament engineering', a bio-inspired framework that treats the swarm's distribution of temperaments, rather than the individual controller, as the design object. It borrows five evolutionarily validated axes of animal temperament (shyness-boldness, exploration-avoidance, activity, aggressiveness and sociability) as a design vocabulary, rendering each as a continuous control parameter $τ\in [0,1]$ above the controller, realisable as a module threshold, a policy-conditioning vector in multi-agent reinforcement learning, or a constraint on a foundation-model planner. A three-phase workflow maps mission success criteria onto relevant axes, plans the shape of the $τ$ distribution, and tunes reaction norms governing how temperament responds to environmental cues. The payoff is greatest under decentralisation: where a central planner can reassign behaviour online, a temperament distribution is a planner output, but in a swarm without global knowledge it must be an offline, anticipatory design input. Behavioural and platform heterogeneity are thereby co-design variables, and I sketch tentative robot-native axes (self-model plasticity, forcefulness, initiative and expressiveness) arising from features robots have and animals do not. Engineered heterogeneity has been shown to outperform homogeneous swarms in tasks such as aggregation and exploration; establishing when, and how much, heterogeneity repays its cost is the work the field can now take forward.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
Codetta: High-Capacity, Keyless, and Undetectable Multi-Agent Collusion
ADF-EA: A Unified Execution Assurance System for Agent Device Foundation
AlphaDiverse: Post-Training Local Quantitative Research Agents for Diverse Exploration in Alpha Factor Mining
The Crowd in the Machine: A Crisis-Informatics Reading of the 2026 Autonomous Agent Incidents
AI-Moderated Interviews for Market Research and Digital Twins Calibration
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.