arXiv preprint ·
Reasoning Instructions Can Break Answer Decoding in Vision--Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) instructions can distort multiple-choice VLM evaluation when a scorer appends a reasoning cue but reads answer-label logits before the model generates any rationale. We call this CoT-prefix scoring. On ScienceQA, Qwen2.5-VL-7B drops from 80.76% to 45.48%, and across five option-content permutations 93.54% of CoT-prefix predictions select the first slot. Condition-matched linear probes recover 78.94% from the same hidden states, while free generation restores 75.24%, showing that the answer often survives the prefix and the immediate readout fails. Vocabulary and layer diagnostics explain the mismatch: probability mass moves toward continuation tokens, while answer information remains linearly accessible in late layers. The effect recurs with varying severity across datasets and models, though not universally. These results show that CoT-prefix scoring can confound model knowledge with an evaluation-interface mismatch and should be avoided unless the requested and scored output events are aligned.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Learning New Words from Unlabeled Test Data in Automatic Speech Recognition
Recursive Self-Improvement via On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning
Personalized Korean Lipreading as Visual Speech Recognition: Transfer, Census and Adaptation on OLKAVS
Prompt Injection Detection for Email Agents Through Attack Chain Modeling
Polite but Misaligned: Evaluating LLM Politeness Judgments Against Human Pragmatic Norms
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.