arXiv preprint ·
Benchmarking Argumentative Behaviour of LLMs: A Study of Defences Against Character Attacks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.3233/faia260824
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as argumentative agents in persuasive dialogues, necessitating rigorous evaluation of their debating competence relative to human interlocutors. In this study, we focus on character attacks (ad hominem arguments), traditionally dismissed as fallacies, which play a pivotal role in political persuasive dialogues where ethos often rivals propositional content. Specifically, we investigate whether modern LLMs can replicate human competence to strategically use and respond to such attacks. We analyse a corpus of natural language political dialogues to identify defensive strategies human interlocutors naturally employ in ethos-centred debates and structure them into a dialogue game. Empirically, we benchmark LLM-generated dialogues against the ElecDeb60to16-fallacy corpus of U.S. presidential debates, contrasting human debaters' repertoire of defensive strategies with those of artificial agents. Results reveal a substantial difference: most LLMs rigidly prioritise logical defences, failing to exploit ethotic counterattacks as valid moves in political discourse. We argue that current safety fine-tuning constraints the strategic action space of these LLMs, making them unable to fully engage in naturalistic interactions within domains where character contestation is a normative expectation rather than a mere fallacy.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Realize What Matters: Principled Context Representation for Large-Scale Reasoning
Learning New Words from Unlabeled Test Data in Automatic Speech Recognition
Beyond Overlap: Estimating the Causal Effect of Benchmark Exposure
Personalized Korean Lipreading as Visual Speech Recognition: Transfer, Census and Adaptation on OLKAVS
Quieter Than the Room: Representation Drift and Task Robustness in Speech Encoders
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.