arXiv preprint ·
Prompt, Probe, Train, or Annotate? Single-camera sports video understanding in amateur settings
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.28049
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Video understanding is usually benchmarked on curated, single-actor, or professionally filmed clips, and a strong score there is routinely read as evidence a model is robust enough for deployment. Amateur team sport is a useful, largely untested place to check that assumption: over eight million students played a school sport in the United States in 2024-25 alone, almost none of it filmed by more than a single fixed camera, with several candidate actors crowded into frame and no operator or second angle to fall back on. Using volleyball as a test case, we ask whether strong performance on general video and world-model benchmarks translates into reliable, per-player attribution once footage is this chaotic, turning footage into statistics through a chain of tasks from finding play boundaries to naming who did what. We evaluate four approaches (prompting and agentic reasoning over frontier vision-language models, classical computer vision with small trained specialists, self-supervised video world models, and manual annotation) at every stage, on 66 amateur matches with 46,648 human-labelled contacts, filmed under conditions no published benchmark uses. No single paradigm wins every stage, and static, single-frame computer vision is not competitive at any stage involving motion or identity. A prompted model segments matches well, yet a far smaller trained model beats it at spotting contacts for a fraction of the cost, and the sport's own rules recover rally outcomes the pixels cannot. Identity is where every automated approach struggles: a jersey number is a static fact temporal reasoning cannot recover if never visible, unlike sporting action, a repeated motor pattern a temporal model can exploit, which is why holistic reasoning improves event detection while identity stays unchanged. We close with where each approach earns its cost, and what transfers beyond volleyball to amateur sport.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Diverse by Design: Architectural Constraints for Prototype-Based Interpretability
Multimodal Routing and Region Refinement for Language-Guided Medical Image Segmentation
Benchmarking Active Spot Selection for Cost-Efficient Spatial Transcriptomics
Direction-Scale Decomposition in Action Representation: Rethinking What to Tokenize for Vision-Language-Action Models
Learning Spectral Allocation: A Fractional Diffusion Framework for Adaptive Volumetric Segmentation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.