arXiv preprint ·
Active Learning for Biodiversity Monitoring: From Label Efficiency to Reliable Ecological Inference
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.27409
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Limited expert annotation capacity is a pervasive constraint in biodiversity monitoring. Passive acoustic recorders and camera traps generate data faster than experts can analyse them. Machine learning (ML) models can process these data at scale, but their reliability depends on the quality, quantity, and coverage of labelled samples, so expert time remains a constraint. Active learning (AL) eases this bottleneck by selecting, under a fixed annotation budget, the samples expected to improve a model most, and published evidence shows it can reduce the labels needed to reach a target performance. Monitoring programmes, however, face a broader question: how should a limited expert budget be divided so that model training, validation, and the ecological estimates built on model outputs all remain reliable? Because AL selects samples non-randomly, its labels are unsuitable for validation, calibration, or threshold selection, a tension rarely acknowledged. We synthesise AL research across acoustic and image modalities and identify gaps and opportunities. Most studies evaluate query strategies on pre-labelled benchmarks with simulated annotators; deployments in real monitoring workflows are rare and concentrate on birds and cetaceans. Bats, insects, amphibians, and fish are underrepresented, and multimodal applications remain largely unexplored. Evaluation centres on headline reductions in annotation effort, often without random-sampling baselines, per-class results, or calibration analysis, and rarely accounts for the labels required for validation. We provide a tutorial treatment of the AL loop that makes these budget decisions explicit, and a roadmap towards AL methods that support label-efficient training, validation, and trustworthy downstream ecological inference.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Artificial intelligence surrogates for treatment effect estimation with before-and-after data
Multimodal Routing and Region Refinement for Language-Guided Medical Image Segmentation
Data-driven discrete-time deep recurrent neural network-based modeling for dissipative systems
Image Fidelity is Not Field Fidelity: Joint Thermodynamic Reconstruction and Error Localization in Neural Tomography
ZO-COSMO: Index-Free One-Hop Mixing for Decentralized Zeroth-Order Optimization
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.