arXiv preprint ·
PotARCin: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Skill Acquisition in Abstract Reasoning Tasks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) has become a prominent benchmark for evaluating general abstract reasoning and fluid intelligence in AI models. Yet standard ARC evaluation considers only a single capability: producing the correct output grid for a test input. We argue that this narrow format fails to evaluate the diversity of abilities that genuine abstract skill acquisition should enable. We introduce PotARCin, a benchmark that extends ARC by assessing understanding of a task's underlying abstract rule across five dimensions: Definition, Classification, Constrained Generation, Editing, and Inversion. PotARCin employs programmatic methods to generate new task instances and transform given inputs for a given ARC task, enabling dynamic generative sampling beyond fixed input-output pairs. Across five state-of-the-art models evaluated on the ARC-AGI-1 training set, we observe a 25-52 percentage-point performance gap between standard ARC evaluation and evaluation on PotARCin, and find that multi-dimensional evaluation reorders models that standard accuracy ranks alike. We further investigate effects of generative sampling, difficulty of corruption types, and questions of self-consistency, showing that models frequently contradict their own formalized rule even where they have stated it correctly. We also introduce P-ARC, a held-out hand-crafted test set, on which models achieve 1-8% accuracy across all five dimensions, underscoring the importance of more holistic evaluations of abstract reasoning capabilities.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Self-Evolving Multimedia Verification through Memory Consolidation of Contestation Experiences
Human-AI-Powered Hypothesis Testing: Cost-Aware Selective AI Scoring and Sequential Human Escalation
Enhancing Small Language Models for Power Outage Report Generation via Minimum Risk Training
Forecast-Dojo: Replayable Environments for Benchmarking and Training LLM Forecasting Agents
XLOG: A CUDA-Native Engine for Neurosymbolic Integration
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.