arXiv preprint ·
Are Stated Reasoning Steps Causally Load-Bearing?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring assumes that the reasoning a model writes reflects the computation that directly produces its answer. Previous faithfulness metrics have been predominantly behavioral, as they simply edit the reasoning text and observe the resulting answer. However, our methodology aims to measure faithfulness causally at the activation level, specifically on self-generated reasoning. Unlike previous causal audits, which measure degradation, our interventions carry a known predicted target. In this way, each patch should switch the answer to a specific counterfactual entity derivable by construction. Specifically, we use synthetic multi-hop lookup tasks (2-6 hops). We patch the residual stream at the token span where the model states each intermediate step with the corresponding activations from a counterfactual run. For Qwen3-4B, 76.9% +/- 2.8% of stated steps are causally load-bearing (CLB) at the most responsive mid-network layer (random-position null: 11.3%; patching the underlying prompt fact: 83%, so stated steps carry approximately 96% of the achievable effect). Moreover, the standard behavioral test on the same items yields 88.2%, which overstates causal faithfulness by 11.4 percentage points (item-matched; 111:14 discordant pairs, p < 1e-15) and, for the easiest items, by up to 20 percentage points. This gap also has a clear capability dimension. Qwen3-1.7B is far less causally faithful overall (54.8%), with its faithfulness collapsing as reasoning depth increases (68% at 2 hops to 30% at 6), while Qwen3-4B remains relatively flat. Although stated reasoning can be causally meaningful, standard behavioral tests tend to overestimate its causal faithfulness, particularly on easier examples where model reasoning appears most fluent.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
SMTB: Fast Structure-Mapping with Tight Bounds
Self-Evolving Multimedia Verification through Memory Consolidation of Contestation Experiences
Hill Sampling for Test-Time Scaling: A Simple and Better Alternative to Repeated Sampling, Evolution, and Training
Enhancing Small Language Models for Power Outage Report Generation via Minimum Risk Training
West-WRF AI 2-km: High-Resolution Prediction of Integrated Vapor Transport and Precipitation
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.