arXiv preprint ·

When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn?

Senrui Chen, Antonio Anna Mele, Francesco Anna Mele and John Preskill

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Quantum PhysicsInformation TheoryMachine LearningMathematical Physics

Abstract

A fundamental question in physics is: When does classical behavior emerge from quantum systems? Bosonic Gaussian states provide a natural setting to explore this quantum-classical boundary, as they capture both the classical field behavior and the intrinsic quantum nature of light. Here, we address this problem from a learning-theoretic perspective by asking: When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn? That is, under what conditions (if any) can an n-mode bosonic Gaussian state be learned with as few samples, and with operations as simple, as are needed to learn a classical 2n-variate Gaussian distribution? We establish a smooth crossover in learnability governed by the state's thermal fluctuations: - Cold Gaussian states are non-classical to learn: When the covariance matrix satisfies $Σ\le(\frac12+O(\frac1n))I$, i.e. close to the vacuum covariance, tomography under single-copy (i.e., non-entangled) measurements fundamentally requires $Ω(n^3)$ copies, strictly exceeding the sample complexity $Θ(n^2)$ of learning classical Gaussian distributions. We show that this hardness persists even when few-copy entangled measurements are allowed. - Warm Gaussian states are classical to learn: When thermal fluctuations exceed the vacuum noise, parameterized by $Σ\ge(\frac12+ν)I$ for any parameter $ν>0$, we prove that single-copy tomography requires $N=Θ\left(n^2\min(n,1+ν^{-1})\right)$ copies. This bound is tight and is achieved by simple, non-adaptive, unentangled heterodyne measurements. Crucially, for $ν=Ω(1)$, the sample complexity drops to $Θ(n^2)$, matching the classical case. Our results tightly characterize a quantum-to-classical crossover in the learnability of bosonic Gaussian states, reveal a novel connection between fundamental physics and statistical learning theory, and have implications for real-world sensing experiments.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Quantum Physics

Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics