arXiv preprint ·
Target alignment, dilution and forecast selection when cross-sectional forecasts share a common target
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Forecasters often score the same units per date against one standardized realized outcome. We show that every standardized forecast splits exactly into a component aligned with this common target and a component uncorrelated with it. Three consequences follow: forecast-error correlation largely mirrors forecast correlation and is therefore a poor measure of diversity; an equally weighted combination beats a no-information forecast only when average alignment is large relative to the combination's dispersion; and the gain from adding a forecaster separates into genuine improvement and mere dilution, which equal-weight admission can mistakenly reward. We develop a cautious selection rule, study it in simulations, and apply it to language-model forecasts of US equity rankings and mechanical signals ranking exchange-traded funds. Selection removes most dilution losses, but no combination beats the no-information forecast.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Econometrics
Modeling interest rate swap volatility with GARCH processes
Model-agnostic noise reduction for high-dimensional time series data
FedIncome: Federated Learning for Income Estimation in Digital Lending Under Data Sovereignty Constraints
Propose, Don't Judge: An Anytime-Valid Referee for LLM Agents That Mine Investment Factors
Packets, Transactions and Queues: Design Principles for HFT Systems from a Measurement Study of CME Market Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Econometrics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.