arXiv preprint ·
You Should Be Properly Scoring Your Odometry
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When we evaluate the performance of our odometry, it is common practice to score the estimated track against a ground truth. Unfortunately, scoring uses point metrics, such as the root mean square error, that ignore the covariance matrix which estimators like filters and smoothers already report. Using the covariance matters for two reasons. First, the covariance encodes the estimator's uncertainty, so it tells us whether the estimator trusts its own output. An overconfident estimator will not report itself lost. Second, the covariance weights the error in each direction of the estimate. Without the covariance, an estimator is unduly penalized for a high error in an uncertain direction. Instead of point metrics, we should use strictly proper scoring rules. These rules score the estimate together with its reported uncertainty. Strictly proper scoring rules recover the point metrics when no covariance is reported, and they diagnose covariance inconsistency when covariance is reported. Using a one-sided pairwise test, we show that two estimators can expose overconfidence in at least one of them without a ground truth. Strictly proper scoring rules and our pairwise test are available in our open-source framework smfeval. As a case study, we use smfeval to assess the uncertainty quality of the translational component of ground-based LiDAR-inertial odometry. Across four filters we find overconfidence - the worst case reports centimeter certainty with kilometer error. Knowing the filters are overconfident, we investigate the mechanism. The investigation traces overconfidence to filters crediting LiDAR measurements with more new information than they carry.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
RoboMP-DINOv2: Prompts, Not Filters for Robust Robot Manipulation
Data-driven discrete-time deep recurrent neural network-based modeling for dissipative systems
A Deployment Study of Identity-Gated Drone Gesture Control
Learning Dissipative Dynamics with Dissipativity-by-Construction Discrete-Time Neural Networks
Digital Twin-Driven VR Teleoperation with Multi-View Spatial Perception for Surgical Robots
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.