arXiv preprint ·
Understanding Maintenance and Support in a Community-Driven Scientific Workflow Ecosystem: A Cross-Space Study of Galaxy
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Galaxy is a widely used, community-driven scientific workflow system whose sustainability depends on continuous maintenance across its software, tools, workflows, infrastructure, documentation, and user-support ecosystem. However, maintenance knowledge in Galaxy is distributed across development and community-support spaces, making it difficult to understand what is maintained, how maintenance artifacts are resolved, and how user-facing concerns connect to repository-level development. We conduct a large-scale empirical study of Galaxy using 11,762 GitHub issues, 52,203 pull requests, and 6,235 Community Forum discussions. We characterize maintenance and support concerns, examine factors associated with resolution outcomes and resolution time, and investigate explicit and candidate connections among maintenance artifacts across these spaces. Using BERTopic modeling, we identify nine issue topics, 14 pull-request topics, and 14 forum topics, revealing a maintenance landscape spanning workflow execution, data management, tools and dependencies, infrastructure, testing, scientific resources, documentation, and user support. Resolution analyses show that coordination, diagnostic, contributor, automation, and engagement characteristics exhibit different associations with whether artifacts are resolved and how quickly resolution occurs. We further find limited explicit traceability between development and support spaces: 97.77\% of 16,426 resolved explicit relationships occur within GitHub, while only 294 connect GitHub artifacts with Community Forum discussions, despite additional semantic and technical relatedness across these spaces. Together, these findings characterize Galaxy maintenance as a distributed ecosystem-level process and identify opportunities to improve diagnostic reporting, lifecycle-aware triage, cross-space traceability, and the reuse of community-support knowledge.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
The Vocabulary of Flaky Tests in Swift
Verified Learning for Compiler Optimization: An LLM-Guided Architecture with Formal Control
Dynamic Conformance Testing of WebGPU Through Specification-Driven Mutation
From PyTorch to the NPU: LLM-Agent-Driven Model Conversion Across Heterogeneous Inference Runtimes
Evaluating Shaker for Flaky Test Detection in Python Projects
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.