arXiv preprint ·
GroundedGEO: Auditing the Evidence Gap in Generative Search Rankings
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Generative search systems rank products and services for consequential decisions, and publishers can cheaply make candidate text look relevant. Yet evidence status is not a text property but a claim-evidence relation: text-only rankers and defenses cannot separate honest detailed content from fabricated detail, creating an identifiability gap. We audit this gap with an evidence-paired benchmark (50 e-commerce queries, 1,950 cases) and a claim-level reranker, GroundedGEO, that penalizes query-relevant claims lacking support in a supplied packet. Matched rich variants control format and volume; packet twins add attestations at fixed text, while thinned packets withdraw them. On the frozen listwise ranker Qwen2.5-7B, unsupported-rich variants show significant normalized rank gain over clean candidates (+0.065 to +0.092 across claim profiles, Holm-corrected), while supported and neutral controls do not; the effect is model-dependent (marginal on MiMo-v2.5, absent on GLM-5.3-Flash). On a frozen pointwise scorer, oracle evidence labels cut the unsupported-rich top-3 rate from 0.65 to 0.43 (laundering from 0.61 to 0.39) at lambda=40 with zero false suppression; packet twins restore the original rates without changing text. Against a 370-claim human gold, all tested automatic judges fail the preregistered reliability gate, although the best local judge retains 79-100% of oracle suppression with zero measured false suppression on protected arms. Separately, stripping attestation coverage increases false suppression by 0.307. These diagnostic effects identify two limits on the evidence channel: label quality and packet coverage. They do not validate an automatic defense, and interpretation of the adverse human-gold arm remains pending adjudication.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
UniK: Universal Knowledge Perception for Digital and Physical AI
Robust Fusion of Semantic and Behavioural Signals for LLM Reranking in Personalised Search
When More Evidence Hurts: Publication-Bias Drift and Principled Stopping for Biomedical Causal Search
ARAFA: An LLM-Generated Arabic Fact-Checking Dataset
Graded-Relevance Composed Multimodal Retrieval for E-commerce Visual Search at Scale
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.