arXiv preprint ·
Spatial Action Review: A Visual Analytics Dashboard for Auditing Language-to-Action Hand-offs in Electron Microscopy
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly explored as interfaces for scientific image analysis, where a visual question-answering (VQA) response may be paired with a spatial output that guides a downstream stage. A supervisor reads the language answer, while a downstream workflow such as segmentation or region review consumes the point-set output. We call this transition from inspecting the answer to relying on its point action the language-to-action hand-off. A silent failure occurs when the answer is correct while the paired action misses annotated objects needed downstream, so answer-based oversight clears a region whose action is unreliable. We introduce Spatial Action Review, a visual analytics dashboard for auditing this failure mode in electron microscopy (EM) mitochondria analysis. It links paired answer-action records through an answer-action ledger, a task-by-dataset risk map, and an image-region audit view, connecting aggregate patterns to image evidence while an adjustable action-reliability gate supports re-audit. The review ends in a human-AI hand-off, where a supervisor records whether the action is accepted, escalated, held under a stricter gate, or flagged for model revision. Across 541 image regions from an EM-adapted Qwen3-VL case-study run, point actions fail the gate in 54.4% of records with a correct VQA response, and 27.4% of all records are silent failures. A correct answer is associated with only a 5.8-percentage-point higher probability of a reliable action, with a bootstrap interval spanning zero; the point-biserial correlation between answer correctness and object coverage is 0.061. This weak coupling persists across five model conditions on 753 matched image regions. Spatial Action Review makes answer-action mismatches visible and ties them to image evidence and a recorded decision before MLLM outputs enter autonomous scientific workflows.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Colon3R: Cross-Domain 3D Reconstruction from Monocular Colonoscopic Video
A Deployment Study of Identity-Gated Drone Gesture Control
Rethinking Diffusion Segmentation: When Does It Rely on Its Noisy State, and Does Diffusion Matter?
Real-World Perception for Autonomous Driving in Adverse Weather: Enhancing Standard Detectors via Foundation-Guided Auto-Annotation
UniK: Universal Knowledge Perception for Digital and Physical AI
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.