arXiv preprint ·
From Articles to Publishers: Aggregating Language Model Predictions for News Source Reliability Inference
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Traditionally, the reliability of news publishers is assessed by expert organisations that evaluate editorial practices, transparency and factual standards at source. When this process is translated into a computational approach, the problem is often formulated at the level of individual articles, with models being trained on a set of pre-labelled articles and their performance being evaluated in a test phase. In this work, we investigate news source reliability inference as a source-level prediction problem. We propose a two-stage framework in which transformer-based language models first estimate the reliability of individual articles and subsequently aggregate article-level predictions to infer the reliability of previously unseen publishers. To approximate realistic deployment conditions, we enforce a strict publisher-disjoint evaluation protocol, ensuring that no publisher appears in both training and test sets. Experiments on 19,476 political news articles from 439 English-language publishers labeled with NewsGuard reliability ratings show that aggregation substantially improves robustness and performance, increasing accuracy from approximately 0.60 at the article level to 0.69 at the publisher level. Finally, we analyze how prediction errors vary across political orientations, revealing statistically significant associations between political leaning and misclassification patterns. Overall, our findings show that publisher reliability can be inferred from aggregated textual signals alone, supporting scalable and content-based approaches to automated news source assessment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Some Dialects Are More Equal Than Others: Non-Prestigious Arabic Dialectal Bias in LLMs
Matryoshka attribution: Learning to attribute language model outputs to representations and weights
Open-Jev Judgments on CallScreenBench: Calibrated One-Pass Scam Screening with a Small Language Model
Compressing Long Context into Answer-Aligned Memory Embeddings for LLM Inference
From Tables to Quantified Statements: Evaluating LLM Inference Generation through Executable Verification
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.