arXiv preprint ·
Are Human-Aligned Models Models of Humans? A Turing-Test Gap in Preference Alignment
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Human-feedback alignment has made language models useful assistants and is commonly described as aligning them with humans. However, the responses people prefer from an AI need not be the responses they themselves would give. We distinguish alignment with human preferences from alignment with human behavior, and show that alignment with human preferences can make model behavior less human-like even when both preferences and responses come entirely from humans. We call this the Turing-test gap. We show that preference alignment preserves the human response distribution only under a restrictive condition, and find no consistent evidence that real human preferences satisfy it. Empirically, the loss of human-response likelihood increases with the strength of preference weighting, regardless of its direction, and the gap also appears under standard DPO. These results establish human-likeness as an explicit dimension of alignment rather than something assumed to follow from preference alignment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
CTRL: Control-Based Time Series Forecasting with LLM-Guided Residual Learning
Some Dialects Are More Equal Than Others: Non-Prestigious Arabic Dialectal Bias in LLMs
Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics
Open-Jev Judgments on CallScreenBench: Calibrated One-Pass Scam Screening with a Small Language Model
Knowing When to Trust Images: Reliability-Aware Multi-modal Entity Alignment
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.