arXiv preprint ·
Error-Supervised Synthetic Learner Writing for Automated Essay Scoring
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Synthetic essays can help reduce dependence on human-written data in Automated Essay Scoring (AES). However, they often lack realistic errors, limiting their ability to represent authentic human writing, particularly when the target texts are intended to resemble those produced by language learners. In this study, we present a simple approach that introduces error supervision into synthetic essay generation. Specifically, we fine-tune an LLM generator on error-annotated texts of the kind commonly used in Grammatical Error Detection (GED). To assess the utility of the proposed approach, we fine-tune and evaluate AES scorers under three data conditions: authentic essays, synthetic essays generated conventionally, and synthetic essays generated using our proposed approach. The results show that in the larger-data settings, the proposed approach outperforms the conventional synthetic baseline in 11 out of 12 dataset-metric comparisons, with performance in some cases approaching that of models trained on authentic essays. Despite these gains, performance under extremely low-resource settings remains mixed, with advantages over the conventional baseline only becoming more apparent at 200 training essays, although not consistently across datasets. Qualitative and quantitative analyses further show that the proposed approach produces learner-like errors whose distributions broadly resemble those observed in authentic essays.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
CTRL: Control-Based Time Series Forecasting with LLM-Guided Residual Learning
Some Dialects Are More Equal Than Others: Non-Prestigious Arabic Dialectal Bias in LLMs
Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics
Open-Jev Judgments on CallScreenBench: Calibrated One-Pass Scam Screening with a Small Language Model
Knowing When to Trust Images: Reliability-Aware Multi-modal Entity Alignment
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.