arXiv preprint ·

Physics-residual machine learning predicts oxygen-evolution catalyst activity beyond the training range from sparse polarization measurements

Yong-Woon Kim, Jihyeok Lee, Sungtae Park, Sooseok Choi and Yung-Cheol Byun

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Published in
arXiv
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2609.23549
Original
Read it at arXiv
Cited by
0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
Topics
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceEmerging Technologies

In brief

Revolutionizing Catalyst Screening

The authors introduce a physics-residual machine learning technique that not only predicts catalyst activity beyond the training range but does so with remarkable accuracy. By combining the Tafel equation with a learned correction approach, they enhance the decision-making process in catalyst screening.

What they found: The study reveals that the physics-residual machine learning method achieves a mean absolute error of 0.203 mA cm$^{-2}$, significantly outperforming the traditional data-driven model, which had an error of 1.330 mA cm$^{-2}$. Furthermore, this approach successfully predicts 282 candidates that exceed the training maximum, indicating its potential for discovering high-performing catalysts.

AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.

Abstract

Screening oxygen-evolution catalysts on combinatorial libraries requires deciding which candidates receive the remaining measurements. The deciding activity lies beyond each candidate's measured potential window and often above every activity recorded during fitting. We predict it by physics-residual machine learning: the Tafel equation extrapolates the candidate's own measured current and slope, a learned residual attenuated with feature-space distance corrects the magnitude, and an applicability-domain score identifies predictions above the training range before measurement. In a separately fabricated 322-candidate library, 282 above the training maximum, two measurements per candidate gave a mean absolute error of 0.203 mA cm$^{-2}$ against 1.330 for the selected data-driven machine-learning model. Errors inside the training range remained comparable, and 35 labelled catalysts were enough to fit it. In two independent datasets the same construction lowered the overpotential error by 29 to 52%. Campaigns can therefore shorten each measurement and still rank the most active compositions.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics