arXiv preprint ·

Distributional Balancing with Machine Learning for Clinical Trial Augmentation Using Real-World Data

Zern Ke, Mingshi Cui, Gemma Moran and Javier Cabrera

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
MethodologyMachine Learning (Statistics)

Abstract

In clinical trials, randomization of treatment and control groups is typically used to ensure the groups have similar covariate distributions on average, resulting in unbiased causal effect estimation. Such balanced covariate distributions are hard to achieve in practice, however, due to recruitment costs, patient dropouts, and more. One possible solution to this problem is to include control patients from external, real world databases. In this paper, we propose DBML, a method that selects control units from a real world database by matching the distribution between the treatment group and the potential control group, instead of matching units between two groups. DBML has three steps. First, we detect anomalous database units (with respect to the treatment distribution) using a variational autoencoder. Second, we re-weight the remaining database units to match the distribution of the treatments. Finally, we use these weights to sample units for our control group. The proposed method is compared to alternative matching-based algorithms and weighted algorithms, achieving superior performance in covariate balance.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Methodology

Get the few papers worth your time in Methodology every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics