arXiv preprint ·
The Evidence Ladder for Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: From Retrospective Policies to Trusted Interventions
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a natural language for healthcare decisions whose conse- quences unfold over time, yet most reported progress remains far from routine intervention. Ex- isting surveys organize the field by algorithm or clinical application. We instead review healthcare RL through an evidence ladder: problem formulation, retrospective identification, policy estima- tion, stress testing, prospective evaluation, and lifecycle monitoring. This view connects clinical treatment, patient engagement, and health-system operations while exposing a recurring gap: evi- dence that a policy scores well in a historical dataset is not evidence that it will improve care. We synthesize the assumptions and failure modes at each rung, identify what evidence can and can- not transfer across settings, and propose reporting practices for cumulative evaluation. Restless bandits are included as one special case, not as the organizing framework. The central lesson is that healthcare RL should be evaluated as an intervention embedded in a changing sociotechnical system, rather than only as an optimizer of a retrospective reward.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
CTRL: Control-Based Time Series Forecasting with LLM-Guided Residual Learning
Rethinking Diffusion Segmentation: When Does It Rely on Its Noisy State, and Does Diffusion Matter?
Why Ghost Outputs Teach: A Kernel-Based Understanding of Subliminal Learning
Exponential Family Synthetic Controls
Optimal No-Regret Learning for Repeated Prophet Inequality
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.